FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 23, 2003

Contact William Mecke
 (404) 463-3011

GRTA's NSAS Reveal Congestion Growth Can Be Limited
Annual Economic Impact of $400 Million to $1.3 Billion Predicted

 ATLANTA - A major transportation infrastructure study of the northern Atlanta region has found that an expansion of the road and transit system within this sub-area - combined with effective land use management and steps to limit travel demand - will enable the region to significantly lessen the impacts of future population and development growth in this fast-growing area, the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) announced today.

The Northern Sub-Area Study (NSAS) is bounded by I-75 (west), I-85 (east), I-285 (south) and Georgia SR 20 (north).

The study also predicted that the economic benefits from reduced congestion, if any of the alternatives are fully implemented, would range from $300 million to more than $1.3 billion per year.

The findings were presented today to the NSAS Steering Committee, comprising local government officials, interest groups and citizen members from the study area.  The results of the study will be provided to the Atlanta Regional Commission for its consideration in the update of the Regional Transportation Plan.

The study looked at three development alternatives:  1) "needs-based" (looking at current development patterns and improvements in the current long-range regional plan), 2) "policy-based" (encouraging growth in existing major centers and corridors and implementing more highway and transit improvements), and 3) "local-based" (using existing land use plans developed by local governments in the study area).  The study examined each alternative to determine the impact of the sub-area by the year 2005.

The study found that, with extensive but financially realistic expansion of the road and transit system, combined with equally extensive travel demand management and road operations programs and effective land use management, each of the alternatives could perform acceptably and mitigate the impacts of predicted household, population, and jobs growth.

The study also revealed each of the alternatives would produce reductions in vehicle travel in the study area as compared to the current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).  Among the key findings is that by focusing growth in major activity centers and along major transportation corridors, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) would also decrease.  Transit use would increase in each of the alternatives.

The travel demand management and road operations tools the NSAS examined include extensive use of High Occupancy Toll lanes (HOT lanes), ramp metering, and signal synchronization.